home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: SCSI vs. EIDE
- Date: 21 Jan 1996 12:25:38 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4dt7ri$s9@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <4dlv8s$mn9@tkhut.sojourn.com> <199601191732.MAA03972@misl.mcp.com> <4ds9vm$ouh@tkhut.sojourn.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- mharrell@sojourn1.sojourn.com (Matt Harrell) writes:
-
- >Even so, the point is still logically valid. EIDE *can* handle 4
- >(i.e., EIDE is not *necessarily*limited to 2).
-
- Saying that EIDE can handle 4 is like saying SCSI can handle 35.
-
- Wether IDE or EIDE, the limit is 2 drives per host adapter. If you
- have a 4 drive host adapter this is basically 2 adapters on a board.
-
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-